November 24, 2013 § Leave a comment
In 2006 at the Center for the Study of Rationality in the Hebrew University, Daniel Kahneman gave a talk titled “Biased Biases: Do Cognitive Biases Give an Advantage to Hawks over Doves”. He repeats much of that same thesis, in this lecture (shared above) at the New School for Social Research entitled “Why Hawks Win”.
To summarize, it demonstrates that given phenomena such as fundamental attribution error or Illusion of transparency and rhetorical advantage to pseudo-certainty …hawks will influence political decision-making far more than doves.
He adds here in this lecture that hawks tend to be hedgehogs, alluding to the Greek poet Archilochus’s phrase: “The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.”
This is contrary to my own impression. Most hawks that I am familiar with in political decision-making, of most third world nations are illiterate bluffers with no expertise in any field so to call them a hedgehog is a compliment they don’t deserve. Nevertheless the following interesting exchange in the Q&A made me pause.
Q from the audience: how might a formal bias be built into the political decision-making system to bias the system against the hawks?
A: I don’t think it can be done
Peter Sloterdijk in his 2009 book Du mußt dein Leben änder (You Must Change Your Life) introduces a set of attractive metaphors and labels to discuss his study of man as a “practicing being” and the varieties of self-formation.
On the immunitary constitution of humans he argues that: “after centuries of experiments with new forms of life the realisation has dawned that humans whatever ethnic, economic and political situation may govern our lives exist not only in ‘material conditions’ but in symbolic immune systems and ritual shells.”
Considering this realisation, ‘European Enlightenment’ is an anomaly and indeed “…why should Europeans be the only ones on a metaphysical diet when the rest of the world continues to dine unperturbed at the richly decked tables of illusion?”
Now it may be argued that this is not really the case that on average ‘Europeans’ may have less explicit but sufficiently elaborate ritual shells. But for the sake of argument it’s not too difficult to link this to the Kahneman’s discussion of rhetorical advantage.
The pseudo certainty of subjects (non-European or otherwise) who dine on just such “richly decked tables” of illusion should grant them undue advantage in political decision-making spheres. Or in simpler language it’s not just the case that the “best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity” given our biases we find the passionate or the religious more convincing.
If this isn’t enough another weapon in the armory of the religious or the pseudo-certain mob is demography. Eric Kaufmann discusses some highlights of his recent work titled Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth. The findings show the more religious people are, regardless of income, faith tradition or education, the more children they have. Within Judaism, the Ultra-Orthodox may achieve majority status over their liberal counterparts by mid-century.Evangelical and neo-traditional Christians will eventually dominate Christianity in the United States and Europe.
…so if the religious are to inherit the earth a doubting minority’s prospect of overcoming the existing bias in favor of all things Hawkish becomes null. Unless this doubting minority has control of institutions and industry for which it would need to devise superior symbolic immune systems that would enable it to outperform existing religions
One quick argument against Eric Kaufman’s thesis is that secularism or religious belief are not genetically determined. They are, like all values, absorbed, or rejected. The hope is that even though the ultraorthodox in all communities are breeding more their children may change/lose faith.
On the other hand stronger religions retain members more effectively than moderate faiths because when you leave a fundamentalist religion, you leave your entire life — family, friends, leisure — behind, not just one compartment. Moreover, retention rates have been rising as fundamentalists have become better organized and began to harness modern technologies of communications, media and record keeping, which help weave a whole world around their members.
Another trend possible trend is that even the few children of secular parents would be drawn to “the richly decked tables of illusion” since relativism cannot inspire.
Some research in the US seems to support this:
Only about 30 percent of those who grow up in an atheist household remain atheists as adults. This “retention rate” was the lowest among the 20 separate categories in the study.
Any thing which would impact this assurance ought to make the variation-friendly attitudes, variation-hostile. Works such as Kaufman’s if not intending just such an impact, are warnings nevertheless. If there is a hostility reinforcing loop then it may influence the system as follows:
The degree of assurance of the secular culture if threatened by demographic trends and its non-adoption by variation-hostile communities living within it should slowly make it more hostile so by some time in future when the proportion of variation-hostile minority is larger, the variation-tolerant majority (if they were ever so) is no longer tolerant. Of the hawks and doves in both camps, the more convincing will be the …. and so on.
To be considered:
# Are hawks more blind to varieties of systemic risk which bring about tragedies in the management of commons?
# Leon Festinger …how about cognitive dissonance? What degree of inequality in the perceived power is necessary for the mind, to justify retroactively the choices that are born of necessity
November 1, 2013 § Leave a comment
The following passages from Burroughs’s Nova Express, off this post on the Reality Studios blog are a real delight for any meme theory enthusiast,
Let me explain how we make an arrest — Nova criminals are not three-dimensional organisms — (though they are quite definite organisms as we shall see) but they need three-dimensional human agents to operate — The point at which the criminal controller intersects a three-dimensional human agent is known as “a co-ordinate point” — And if there is one thing that carries over from one human host to another and establishes identity of the controller it is habit: idiosyncracies, vices, food preferences … a chain smoker will always operate through chain smokers, an addict through addicts … a single controller can operate through thousands of human agents, but he must have a line of co-ordinate points … (p. 54. ~ Nova Express (New York: Grove Press, 1964))
# that habit establishes identity is some uncanny foresight. Our browsing/searching habits have revealed more about us than any outward display or utterance. Though in the passage above it’s the memes/nova criminals that leave traces based on target preference. Its more like, certain viruses can be traced through a trail of infected types. If all infected were alcoholic Chinese ornithologists then we’d know what sort of a meme it may have been.The reverse scenario is the one to be concerned with, that Nova police will find, that I am an alcoholic Chinese ornithologist based on the memes I contracted/took on-board.
Virus defined as the three-dimensional co-ordinate point of a controller — Transparent sheets with virus perforations like punch cards passed through the host on the soft machine feeling for a point of intersection … What does virus do wherever it can dissolve a hole and find traction? — It starts eating — And what does it do with what it eats? — It makes exact copies of itself … A vast tapeworm of bring down word and image moving through your mind screen always at the same speed on a slow hydraulic-spine axis like the cylinder in the adding machine. (p. 68. ~ Nova Express (New York: Grove Press, 1964))
#Ok which cylinder is “the” cylinder? Burroughs’s grandfather was the inventor of Burroughs adding machine, …What is imagined, is movement of a parasite round an axis which generates a reel of words and images in some Cartesian theater.
#.. a slow hydraulic-spine axis …in another post on the Reality Studios blog mention is made of correspondence between Burroughs & Ballard and their interest in the hypothesis that dinosaurs possessed a “sacral brain”.. why should this matter? … is it that the image of spine taken over by some worm winding round it, & making copies of itself easier to conjure ?…or analogous to the some operation of the adding machine?
The basic nova mechanism is very simple: always create as many insoluble conflicts as possible and always aggravate existing conflicts — This is done by dumping life forms with incompatible conditions of existence on the same planet — There is of course nothing “wrong” about any given life form since “wrong” only has reference to conflicts with other life forms — The point is these forms should not be on the same planet — Their conditions of life are basically incompatible in present time form and it is precisely the work of the Nova Mob to see that they remain in present time form, to create and aggravate the conflicts that lead to the explosion of a planet that is to nova — At any given time recording devices fix the nature of absolute need and dictate the use of total weapons … (p. 52.~ Nova Express (New York: Grove Press, 1964) )
What scared you all into time? Into shit? I will tell you: “the word”. Alien word “the.” “The” word of Alien Enemy imprisons “thee” in Time. (p. 12.~ Nova Express (New York: Grove Press, 1964) )
# This “the” word lock, is a tricky meme to dissect. Sean Strum at Te Ipu Pakore, in his nice summary lists some of the assertions in Electronic Revolution. Therein Burroughs holds that the definite article “the” contains the implication of one and only. If there is another, then THAT universe, is no longer THE universe,….so it denies the possibility of any other.Because If other universes are possible, then the universe is no longer THE[;] it becomes A
#… a deterministic bull? sure but one with a twist …this infection model (where alien words such as “THE” imprison the speaker in time) unlike stronger theories of linguistic determinism, suggests that cure is possible through strategy (cut-ups, fold-ins and picture language). But the point is often made by Burroughs more clearly using the resources of the language in a formal way rather than through cut-ups, fold-ins or picture language.
Tim Tyler at “On Memetics” blog regularly reviews and critiques usage of the concept meme in publications and other discourse fronts. Checked his opinion on the priest, he writes that Burroughs seems to have grasped a fair chunk of the essence of memetics
#…Burroughs’s cut-up recordings, are not the most enduring of parasites, I can’t usually give them more than one listen …Do they reveal the mechanism of contraction and subsequent replication? …not sure …I am already copying it into this post for some poor reader to waste some living minutes on …some line there to be traced by the Nova police.